KONSTITUSIONALITAS PERMENKUMHAM NOMOR 02 TAHUN 2019 PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK NORMA MELALUI MEDIASI

Anjaly Rosdiansyah  Dewi; Syofyan  Hadi

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i2.97

Authors

Anjaly Rosdiansyah Dewi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Syofyan Hadi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.97

Keywords:

Konstitusionalitas, Mediasi, Konflik Norma, Constitutionality, Mediation, Conflict of Norms

Abstract

Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 2 of 2019 concerning Disharmony Settlement Laws and Regulations Through Mediation regulates the mediation process for disharmony of several regulations such as Ministerial Regulation; Regulation of Non-Ministerial Government Institutions; Regulations from Non-Structural Institutions; and Regional Regulations. Whereas if a regulation is in conflict with other regulations, then a judicial review can be conducted to the Supreme Court and this has been stipulated in the 1945 Constitution where the 1945 Constitution is the highest statutory regulation and there is no lower statutory regulation that can override the provisions The 1945 Constitution. This type of research can be classified as a type of normative research. In this study, the focus is to examine the level of synchronization of law and the principle of law, namely the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferior. Source of data used secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, data collection techniques in this study with the literature review method, after the data collected and then analyzed to draw conclusions. From the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that, First, the authority of the Ministry of law and human rights in completing the disharmony of laws and regulations based on Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 2 of 2019 is something that violates higher legal norms or norms. Because the 1945 Constitution which gives the authority to examine the legislation under the law against the law is to the Supreme Court and not to other institutions. Second, the Supreme Court should conduct a judicial review in which the ideal concept of authority is regulated in the 1945 Constitution and not the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. If you want to test the statutory regulations, then the laws and regulations must be made in the form of laws

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dian Agung Wicaksonso, “Implikasi Re eksistensi Tap Mpr dalam hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Terhadap Jaminan Atas Kepastian Hukum yang adil di Indonesia”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 1, Maret 2013.

Muten Nuna & Roy Marthen Moonti, Kebebasan Hak Sosial Politik Dan Partisipasi Warga Negara Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Volume 4 Nomor 2 Oktober 2019.

Undang – Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

PERMA RI. No. 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Prosedur Mediasi

di Pengadilan.

Kosasih, Ade, John Kenedi, Imam Mahdi, Dinamika Hukum Admistrasi Indonesia, Bengkulu: Penerbit Vanda, 2017. Mahdi, Imam, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Teras, 2011

, Cetakan ke-1. Marbun, S. F., Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1997. Pudjosewojo, Kusumadi, Pedoman Pelajaran Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.