TANGGUNG JAWAB PIHAK  KEPOLISIAN DI POLRES MOJOKERTO DALAM PENGELOLAAN BARANG BUKTI

Muchammad Ferdin Fauzi Putra; Syahrul Borman; Wahyu Prawesthi

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i3.854

Authors

Muchammad Ferdin Fauzi Putra Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Syahrul Borman Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Wahyu Prawesthi Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.854

Keywords:

Tanggung Jawab, Barang Bukti, Penyidikan, Kepolisian, Responsibility, Evidence, Investigation

Abstract

This study examines the role of the police in managing evidence during the investigation process at Mojokerto Police Resort. Evidence management is a crucial aspect of criminal law enforcement, whose success is influenced by procedural accuracy, officer integrity, and an accountable storage system. Based on normative legal research methods with statutory and legal theory approaches, it was found that evidence management at Mojokerto Police Resort has largely complied with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Police Regulation No. 10 of 2010, and Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 16 of 2014. However, there are still practices of evidence utilization by certain officers under the pretext of official needs, which contradict the principle of chain of custody and pose a risk of legal violations. Therefore, strengthening accountability and internal supervision is necessary to ensure the integrity of evidence. This study contributes to the development of police policy and the improvement of evidence management governance in a juridical and professional manner

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A., & Hatta, M. (2022). The Application of the Burden of Proof Concept in Indonesia: A Comparative Study. SASI; Volume 28 Issue 3, September 2022DO - 10.47268/Sasi.V28i3.1045 . Retrieved from https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1045

Ali Shah, S. A., & Hussain, B. (2021). Challenges Faced by Police Officers in Forensic Criminal Investigation A Case Study of District Peshawar, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. SSRN Electronic Journal, 13(4), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3745301

Anitha, C., Priyadharshini, R., Sivajothi, E., Kumaran, G., Sudha, K., & Sireesha, B. (2024). Experimental Evaluation of Secured Forensic Evidence Handling Scheme using Blockchain Technology. In 2024 4th International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT61985.2024.10625999

Arifin, S., Borman, M. S., Sidarta, D. D., & Handayati, N. (2024). Peran Penyidik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Penegakan Hukum Cybercrime. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 4(02), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v4i02.1505

Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2016). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, (Jakarta), 15.

Bangsa, W. I., & Zarani, T. R. (2023). Legality of Electronic Information According to Law No. 19 of 2016 as Evidence in Trials at Court. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(1), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230152

Barcelos, C. D., Cardozo, E. L., Reyes, G. P., Fernandes, G. P., Mezzomo, J. C., Czerwinski, L., … Silva, V. da. (2024). INVESTIGAÇÃO FORENSE: MÉTODOS E FERRAMENTAS UTILIZADAS PARA RESOLVER CRIMEs. Revft, 57–58. https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/fa10202410041157

Bell, W. R. (2002). Practical criminal investigations in correctional facilities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040647

Crowe, J. (2007). Dworkin on the Value of Integrity. Deakin Law Review, 12(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2007vol12no1art170

Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media.

Endri. (2021). URGENCY AND MECHANISM OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE VALIDATION IN ELECTRONIC COURT EVIDENCE RULES. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 4(1 SE-Articles), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.412021.89-104

Febriawan, Y. (2024). Police Duties and Functions in Realizing Justice and Legal Certainty Under Police Law No. 2 Of 2002. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 3(6), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v3i6.4941

Febyanti, A., Aini, B. K., Laila, A., Putri, Q., & Putri, B. (2024). Pelanggaran Pembatasan Kewenangan Aparat Penegak Hukum Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Terkait Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Penyidikan. MANDUB, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i2.1240

Gekoski, A. (2024). The use of investigation management documents in rape and serious sexual offence cases. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-06-2024-0049

Gupta, G., & Husain, A. (2023). Digital Evidence in Police Investigation: A Comparative Analysis of Challenges Faced in India, the UK and the United States. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 6(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069231184977

Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Jailani, M., & Faisal, M. (2024). Sistem Pembuktian Pidana Pada Pelanggaran Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 10(3), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.675

Ketaren, S. M. S., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Hamdan, M. (2013). Peranan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Ppns) Perpajakan dan Penyidik Polri dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan. USU Law Journal, 1(2), 57–75.

Limbong, B., & Riswadi, R. (2022). Authority Of Polri Investigators in The Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, (10). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2319756

Lokas, R. (2013). Barang Bukti dan Alat Bukti Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Crimen, II(3). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/2425

Made Pasek Swardhyana, G., & Irawan, A. (2022). Evidence In Sexual Violence Crime Cases. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences , 3(5 SE-Articles), 1943–1950. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.491

Martinsp, S. (2005). Lost and Destroyed Evidence: The Search for a Principled Approach to Abuse of Process. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 9(3), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2005.9.3.158

MUHAMMAD FARID RIZQI. (2022). PENGELOLAAN BARANG BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KABUPATEN SEMARANG (Berdasarkan Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: PER-036/A/JA/09/2011 Tentang Standar Operasional Prosedur Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum). Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI.

Muhardi, D., Harahap, I., & Pardede, R. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI PENGELOLAAN BARANG BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRESTA PEKANBARU. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 8, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i1.1680

Mustafa M, M., T C, K., N, K., & Bharathi M, L. (2024). Forensic Evidence Management Using Blockchain Technology. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 9(4), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24apr354

Nugroho, B. (2017). PERANAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM MENURUT KUHAP. Yuridika, 32(1 SE-Criminal Law), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780

Okfida, I., Madjid, A., & Noedajasakti, S. (2023). Juridical Overview of the Authority for the Confiscation of Evidence in the Code of Criminal Procedure and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for Administration and Technical Guidelines for General and Special Criminal Court Proceedings of the Indonesia Supreme Court. Path of Science, 9(10), 5019–5028. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.97-21

Radbruch, G., Paulson, B. L., & Paulson, S. L. (2006). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600538

Rio Heronimus Kaluara Sasuang, Borman, S., & Handayati, N. (2021). SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001. Aksiologi, 3(5), 6.

Rizal, M. I. (2024). Analisa Prosedur Tembakan Peringatan terhadap Keselamatan Petugas dan Publik. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(12), 5570–5579. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i12.1889

Sari, I. (2024). KEKUATAN KEABSAHAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA DI INDONESIA. JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) Universitas Suryadarma, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jsi.v11i2.1245

Satria, H. (2021). Hukum Pembuktian Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media.

Soekanto, S. (1982). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali.

SUDA, I., & SUWANDA, I. (2022). KAJIAN TUGAS DAN FUNGSI POLRI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM. GANEC SWARA, 16, 1334. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v16i1.270

Supriyanto, S., Barthos, M., & Farhan, H. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Republic of Indonesia Police Code of Ethics. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 3, 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v3i6.326

Tahir, R., Si, M., Gde, I., Astawa, P., Widjajanto, A., Mompang, L., … Paminto. (2023). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BIDANG HUKUM; Suatu Pendekatan, Teori dan praktik.

ULYA, M. R. I. (2023). TANGGUNGJAWAB PENYIDIKPOLRI TERHADAP BARANG BUKTI NARKOBA HASIL SITAAN DIWILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESORT KOTA JAMBI. UNIVERSITAS BATANGHARI JAMBI. Retrieved from http://repository.unbari.ac.id/2280/1/SKRIPSI M. RIFKY IHSANDI ULYA NIM 1700874201248 %281%29.pdf

Velasquez, C. (2017). Evidence Tracking and Secure Storage (pp. 9–18). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315154916-2

Wijaya, A., & Santiago, F. (2024). Enforcement of State Law by the Republic of Indonesia Attorney General’s Office in the Perspective of Law Number 16 of 2004. Devotion?: Journal of Research and Community Service, 5(6), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i6.741