ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PASAR MODAL INDONESIA: ANALISIS SISTEM HUKUM DAN REKONSTRUKSI MENUJU KEADILAN EFISIEN

Dhoni Martien; Yulianto Guritno

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i2.710

Authors

Dhoni Martien Universitas Jayabaya
Yulianto Guritno Universitas Jayabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i2.710

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Capital Market, LAPS SJK, Legal System Theory, Constitutional Court Decision, PPSK Law, Social Engineering.

Abstract

An effective dispute resolution is a fundamental pillar for investor confidence and capital market stability. This study critically examines the dispute resolution system in the Indonesian capital market following its integration into the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK). This research employs a normative juridical method using Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory as an analytical tool to dissect the current state (das sein) and Roscoe Pound's theory of law as a tool of social engineering to formulate an ideal model (das sollen). The first research question analyzes the effectiveness and problems of LAPS SJK, highlighting the paradoxical impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XII/2014. This decision, while intended to remove procedural hurdles, has inadvertently facilitated the filing of annulment of arbitral awards and eroded the principle of finality. The second research question formulates a reconstruction of the ADR mechanism in the capital market by leveraging the momentum of Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening (PPSK Law) to mitigate the negative impacts of the said Constitutional Court decision. The findings indicate that the current system experiences dysfunction due to inconsistencies between the altered legal substance, a judicial structure that remains the final destination, and a litigation-oriented legal culture. Therefore, it is recommended to engineer the law through the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to redefine the grounds for annulment in technical regulations, optimize Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and align the legal culture of capital market actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, A. C. Al, & Mawarid, M. L. A. (2025). Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 Mengenai Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Sriwijaya Journal of Private Law, Vol. 2(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.28946/sjpl.v2i1.4809

Benfa, A. F. P., Marjo, & Utama, K. W. (2025). Pelaksanaan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Pasca-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 14(2). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2012). The Constitution of Indonesia: A Contextual Analysis. Hart Publishing (Constitutional Systems of the World Series).

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hadjon, P. M., & Djamiati, T. S. (2014). Argumentasi Hukum. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190464585.001.0001

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Moore, W. H. (1942). The Reorganization of Railroad Corporations. A Study of the Public Interest. Harvard Law Review, 56(3), 510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1334883

Musataklima. (2017). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 15/PUU-XII/2014 Terhadap Putusan Badan Arbitrase Di Indonesia. Et-Tijarie, 4(1), 76–94.

Nasution, B. (2001). Keterbukaan Dalam Pasar Modal (Pertama). Fakultas Hukum U.I. Program Pascasarjana.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 61/POJK.07/2020 Tentang Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan, Pub. L. No. 61/POJK.07/2020 (2020).

Prakoso, D. (2017). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Arbitrase Dibandingkan Dengan Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Mimbar Justitia, Vol. 3(2), 210–225. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/jmj/article/view/280

Prasad, K. (2012). Reviews: New Literature on Law and Political Institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Vol. 31(4), 127–140.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014, Pub. L. No. 15/PUU-XII/2014, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (2014).

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan Dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan, Pub. L. No. 4 (2023).

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Pub. L. No. 30 (1999).