POLITIK DUALISME KURIKULUM PIAUD: STUDI KOMPARATIF KURIKULUM KEMENAG DAN KEMENDIKBUD DALAM IMPLEMENTASI LITERASI DINI

Vina Uctuvia; Euis Fajriyah; Mohammad Wahyudin; Daryanto Daryanto

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i2.652

Authors

Vina Uctuvia Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon
Euis Fajriyah Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon
Mohammad Wahyudin Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon
Daryanto Daryanto Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i2.652

Keywords:

Literacy, Education Policy, Framing Analysis

Abstract

Early childhood education (ECE) serves as a critical foundation for children's literacy, language, and character development. In Indonesia, this foundational stage is complicated by a dual curriculum policy implemented by two ministries: the Ministry of Religious Affairs (Kemenag) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (Kemendikbudristek). This study aims to critically analyze how early literacy is conceptualized in two official curricula—PAUD 2013 (Kemendikbudristek) and PIAUD 2020 (Kemenag)—through thematic content analysis and critical discourse analysis. The findings reveal that both curricula construct literacy within different ideological frames: the PAUD 2013 curriculum emphasizes scientific, play-based, and developmental approaches, while the PIAUD 2020 curriculum embeds religious values, character building, and Islamic traditions into literacy practices. This divergence creates pedagogical confusion at the implementation level, particularly in pesantren-based institutions that straddle both frameworks. The analysis also highlights how curriculum texts serve as ideological instruments, shaping educators’ practices through discursive constructions of knowledge, power, and morality. This study concludes that curriculum reform must move beyond technical alignment toward ideological integration, and recommends cross-ministerial training to bridge interpretive gaps among educators. The research contributes to the growing discourse on critical curriculum studies and educational policy in multicultural contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. (2013). Pedoman Kurikulum PAUD 2013. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Fauzi, A., & Nurhayati, S. (2021). Dualisme kebijakan pendidikan anak usia dini di Indonesia: Studi kasus implementasi kurikulum PIAUD di pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24042/al-auladi.v6i1.1234

Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

Haryanto, H. (2022). Ketidaksinkronan indikator literasi dalam kurikulum PAUD nasional: Tinjauan kebijakan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebijakan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 55–67.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2020). Keputusan Dirjen Pendidikan Islam Nomor 2761 Tahun 2020 tentang Kurikulum PIAUD. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, Kemenag RI.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Kemendikbud.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Muhaimin. (2018). Paradigma pendidikan Islam: Upaya menanamkan nilai-nilai Islam dalam sistem pendidikan nasional. Kencana.

Neuman, S. B., & Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3). The Guilford Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. H. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727–757). Longman.

Suryadi, A. (2016). Pengelolaan pendidikan anak usia dini berbasis pesantren: Kekuatan lokal dalam sistem pendidikan nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 35–50.

UNESCO. (2017). Early childhood care and education matters: Evidence from the Asia-Pacific region. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000250405

Yulianti, E. (2022). Pemahaman guru PAUD terhadap standar literasi anak usia dini: Studi kasus di lembaga PIAUD. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 10(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpaud.v10i1.12345