SINKRONISASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYANDANG DISABILITAS TUNA GRAHITA SEBAGAI SAKSI KORBAN DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA

Authors

  • Dian Novianti Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Tomy Michael Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.275

Keywords:

tuna grahita, perlindungan hukum, penyandang disabilitas, legal protection, persons with disabilities

Abstract

Protection of clear legal rights for persons with intellectual disabilities is promulgated in Law No. 8/ 2016. However, these legal provisions face disharmony because they are out of sync with the laws and regulations that govern criminal justice in the matter of being a victim-witness. This conflict between law and related legislation raises the most important ambiguity in matters of law enforcement. therefore, must try horizontal sync. Legal requirements regarding the standard procedure for determining witnesses for a variety of disabilities, the obligation to assist mentally retarded people linked to legal expertise and accessibility for persons with disabilities in court of law. The government needs as soon as possible to draft a government regulation as the implementing provision of Law No. 8/ 2016, so that there is clarity and legal certainty, especially for law enforcers and people with intellectual disabilities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Priamsari, RR. Putri. 2019. ‘Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 48.2: 215 <https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.48.2.2019.215-223>

Barkah, Aah Laelatul. 2019. ‘Perlindungan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Tuna Grahita Sebagai Saksi Korban Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia’, ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 12.2: 123–40 <https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v12i2.4494>

Itasari, Endah Rantau. 2020. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Di Kalimantan Barat’, Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id, 32.1: 70–82 <https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/integralistik/article/view/25742>

Keadilan, Mimbar, Eriq Panca, and Nur Patria. 2022. ‘DISABILITAS Pendahuluan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia ( HAM ) Di Indonesia Merupakan Salah Satu Amanat Reformasi . Upaya Perubahan Yang Telah Dilakukan Dalam Bidang Hukum Adalah Dengan Memasukan Jaminan HAM Bagi Warga Negara Dalam Konstitusi . Penambahan Ja’, 15.45: 109–21

Muhtarom, Muhammad. 2014. ‘Harmonisasi Dan Sinkronisasi Peraturan Hukum Perkoperasian Dan Lembaga Keuangan Mikro’, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3.2 <https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11094>

Nasution, R Hendrik, Ricky Avenzora, ) Dan, Tutut Sunarminto, Analis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, and others. 2018. ‘ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN DAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN EKOWISATA DI INDONESIA (The Analysis of Ecotourism Laws and Policies in Indonesia)’, 23.1: 9–17

Nur, Insan Tajali. 2014. ‘SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN’: 158–74

Peraturan, Disharmoni, and Perundang-undangan D I Bidang. 2013. ‘Disharmoni Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Bidang Agraria’, 10

Rosidah, Zaidah Nur. 2013. ‘Sinkronisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Mengenai Perkawinan Beda Agama’, Al-Ahkam, 23.1: 1 <https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2013.23.1.70>

Saputro, Muhammad Bayu, Natangsa Surbakti, and Kelik Wardiono. 2020. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Korban Tindak Pidana Asusila: Studi Di Sasana Inklusi Dan Gerakan Advokasi Difabel (SIGAB)’, Jurnal Jurisprudence, 10.1: 73–93 <https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i1.10527>

Sodiqin, Ali. 2021. ‘Ambigiusitas Perlindungan Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18.1: 31 <https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.707>

W.M, Maria Petronela, Agnes Widanti Soebiyanto, and Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi. 2021. ‘Analisis Pelaksanaan Pemenuhan Hak Atas Informasi Dan Hak Kesehatan Reproduksi Perempuan Penyandang Disabilitas Di Kota Semarang’, Jurnal Usm Law Review, 4.2: 547 <https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.3229>

Downloads

Published

2023-01-20

How to Cite

Novianti, D. ., & Michael, T. . (2023). SINKRONISASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYANDANG DISABILITAS TUNA GRAHITA SEBAGAI SAKSI KORBAN DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(2), 1705–1718. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.275