URGENSI PENGATURAN PRINSIP MINIMAL UTANG SEBAGAI SYARAT KEPAILIATAN BAGI DEBITOR

Revita Pirena  Putri; Endang  Prasetyawati

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i1.197

Authors

Revita Pirena Putri Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Endang Prasetyawati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.197

Keywords:

Urgensi, Minimal Utang, Debitor pailit, Kepailitan, Urgency, Minimum Debt, Bankrupt Debtor, Bankruptcy

Abstract

Bankruptcy is an example of a form of effort that can be taken by the parties as an effort to ask for accountability. In Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations for Payment of Debt, it regulates the requirements for a debtor to be declared bankrupt by the Court. There are at least 3 requirements, namely, the debtor has 2 or more creditors, there is at least one debt that has not been paid in full and there is debt that is due and collectible. However, in relation to these requirements, Indonesia has not regulated the provisions for the amount of debt borne by the debtor so that the debtor can be declared bankrupt. Problems will arise, if the debtor who is bankrupt is a debtor who has a greater amount of wealth compared to the debt he has. This study aims to find out, understand and explain the urgency of minimum debt arrangements as a condition for debtors to be bankrupt. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory law approach, approach and comparative approach through sources of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials which are collected using collection techniques in the form of inventorying and categorizing legal materials which are then analyzed using prescriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study are that the minimum debt principal arrangement is a condition that must be regulated in bankruptcy arrangements in Indonesia. The existence of minimum debt requirements for filing for bankruptcy against debtors can provide legal protection for debtors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Fuady, Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017.

M. H. Subhan, Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2015.

C. S. T. Kansil, Pokok-Pokok Pengetahuan Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

M. Nurmawati, P. Kekhususan, H. Bisnis, and F. Hukum, “Pengaturan Insolvency Test Dalam Penjatuhan,” pp. 1–15, 2004.

H. A. Simanjuntak et al., “Prinsip prinsip dalam hukum kepailitan dalam penyelesaian utang debitur kepada kreditur,” vol. 02, no. 02, 2020.

S. R. Sjahdeini, Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2022.

B. Pratama, “Kepailitan Dalam Putusan Hakim Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Formil dan Materil Kajian Putusan Nomor 02/Pailit/2012/PN.SMG dan Nomor 522K/Pdt.Sus/2012,” J. Yudisial, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 157–172, 2014.

I. K. Gde, S. Siddhi, and N. P. Purwanti, “Perbandingan Hukum Negara Indonesia Dengan Hukum Negara Belanda Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Sisa Hutang Debitor Pailit Abstrak,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 375–388, 2020.

H. K. Dan, N. Sulisrudatin, and S. Ip, “Hukum Kepailitan dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 158–173, 1997.

S. Aprita and R. Adhitya, “Penerapan ‘Asas Keadilan’ Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitor,” J. Huk. Media Bhakti, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2019, doi: 10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.44.

P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2020.

I. M. Udiana, Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Bali: Udayana University Press, 2015.

D. Surjanto, “Urgensi Pengaturan Syarat Insolvensi Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang,” J. Huk. Kenotariatan, vol. 3, no. 2, 2018.

L. J. Min and R. Nordin, “Debtor protection within bankruptcy proceeding in malaysia and singapore: A comparative analysis,” Malaysian J. Consum. Fam. Econ., vol. 23, no. s1, pp. 162–193, 2019.

M. H. Shubhan, “Misuse of bankruptcy petitions by creditors: The case of Indonesia,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 195–217, 2019.

N. L. G. S. S. Laksmi and N. L. G. Astariyani, “Upaya Debitor Untuk Menghindari Kepailitan,” Kertha Wicara, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2019.